2000 WI App 87 - State v. Canady’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Huml v. Vlazny (2006), State v. Grady (2007)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 203 Wis. 2d 43 - State v. Behnke · Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. McDonald · 230 Wis. 2d 324 - State v. Madlock · 190 Wis. 2d 252 - State v. Kennedy · 119 Wis. 2d 837 - State v. Serebin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In proving causation, a victim must show that the defendant's criminal activity was a 'substantial factor' in causing damage. The defendant's actions must be the 'precipitating cause of the injury' and the harm must have resulted from 'the natural consequence[s] of the actions.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“Restitution is governed by Wis. Stat. § 973.20 , which requires courts to order full or partial restitution 'under this section' to any victim of a crime 'unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ziegler · State v. Queever“shall order the defendant to make full or partial restitution... [i]f a crime considered at sentencing resulted in damage to or loss or destruction of property.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.