Johnson v. Carleton’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Holland v. Sebunya · Woolley v. Henderson · Webb v. Haas · Reeves v. Travelers Insurance Companies · Corey v. Norman, Hanson & DeTroy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[r]ecognizing the continued vitality of implied contract as an independent cause of action would be fundamentally inconsistent with the modern view that malpractice actions should be predicated on a single basis of liability' — deviation from the professional standard of care.” Johnson, 765 A.2d at 573 n. 3 (quoting Woolley, 418 A.2d at 1135 ) (internal quotation mark omitted). These courts have reasoned that implied contract is ‘'inadequate] ... as a comprehensive liability base in malpractice actions,” Woolley, 418 A.2d at 1135 , because a duty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When by these rules or by a notice given thereunder or by order of court an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, the court for cause shown may at any timé in its discretion ... (2) upon motion made after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.