State v. Millay’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania v. Muniz · Combs v. Coyle · United States v. Rivera · United States v. Burson · United States ex rel. Savory v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Filler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.