State v. Barnard’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2024
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New Jersey Department of Corrections v. Nash · United States v. Harrell · United States v. Walters · State v. Marden · United States v. DiMarzo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A conviction may be based on circumstantial evidence, even if inferences made from such evidence are contradicted by parts of the direct evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Woo“the State was required to prove that the [trafficked drug was] in fact a scheduled drug, an essential element of the crime charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he State had the burden to prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the tablets were Dilaudid,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.