State v. Whipple’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2023
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Finley · State v. Harris · State v. Huerta · State v. Henderson · State v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the declarant made the statement for the purpose of obtaining a "medical diagnosis or treatment;" (2) the statement "described:" (A) the declarant's "medical history;" (B) "past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations;" or (C) the "inception or general character of the cause or external source" of those symptoms, pains, or sensations; and (3) the statement was "reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment" of the declarant's symptoms, pains, or sensations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“statements must be made with an intention that is consistent with seeking medical treatment and must be statements that would be relied upon by a doctor when making decisions regarding diagnosis or treatment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. A. Porter“A mere assertion that constitutional rights are implicated or that failure to review the claimed error may result in a manifest miscarriage of justice is insufficient to implicate the plain error doctrine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Clemans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.