Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 MT 178 - State v. Stuart

State v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · City of Billings v. Bruce · State v. Steward · Delaware v. K-Decorators, Inc. · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that direct proof of a defendant's state of mind may not always be possible and that the State's ability to anticipate the nature of the defendant's defense may vary from case to case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “delay would have provided more—not less—time to locate [exculpatory] witnesses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.