State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Whitlow v. State (2008), State v. Gunderson (2010)
86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · State v. Finley · State v. White · Jones v. Wood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not prejudice a defendant to the degree that the outcome of the trial is implicated, the claim may be dismissed without evaluating counsel's performance.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Montoya · State v. Main“Though not easily distilled into a formula, the definitive question that distinguishes and decides which actions are record and which are non-record, is why? In other words, if counsel fails to object to the admission of evidence, or fails to offer an opening statement, does the record fully explain why counsel took the particular course of action? If not, then the matter is best-suited for post-conviction proceedings which permit a further inquiry into whether the particular representation was ineffective. Only when the record will fully explain why counsel took, or failed to take, action in providing a defense for the accused may this Court review the matter on direct appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Becker“The trial record must adequately document a challenged act or omission of defense counsel for a defendant to raise an ineffective assistance claim on appeal. In addition to documenting the error, the record available to this Court on appeal must afford sufficient understanding of the reasons for counsel’s act or omission to answer the threshold question of whether the alleged error expresses a trial strategy or tactical decision. If the record does not supply the reason for counsel’s act or omission, the claim must be raised by petition for post-conviction relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Worthan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.