Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 MT 249 - State v. Bilant

State v. Bilant’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · State v. Kuneff · State v. Long · State v. Nelson · State v. Rinehart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““an investigative subpoena ... exists when facts and circumstances ... would warrant an honest belief in the mind of a reasonable and prudent person that an offense has been, or is being, committed and that ... information relative to the commission of that offense is in the possession of the person or institution to whom the subpoena is directed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.