Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 MT 250 - State v. Gray

State v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · State v. Reesman · State v. Rinehart · State v. Worrall · State v. Crowder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the judge evaluates the facts asserted within the four corners of the application and makes a practical, commonsense decision as to whether there is a fair probability that incriminating items will be found in the place to which entry is sought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.