Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 MT 254 - State v. Placzkiewicz

State v. Placzkiewicz’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strouth v. Tennessee · Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & Son · State v. Hanson · Coleman v. State · State v. Redcrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “With respect to postconviction proceedings, the Legislature has set forth a specific statute of limitations at § 46-21-102, MCA.... We hold that the specific statute of limitations for postconviction proceedings provided in Title 46, Chapter 21, controls over other statutes of limitations and the tolling provisions relating to those.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.