Olson v. Daughenbaugh’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 district · 12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Holtman v. 4-G's Plumbing & Heating, Inc. · Doting v. Trunk · Thayer v. Uninsured Employers' Fund · Buerkley v. Aspen Meadows Ltd. Partnership · Neustrom v. State, Department of Labor & Industry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Action against uninsured employer - limitation of employer’s defenses. If an injured employee or the employee’s beneficiaries bring an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained or for death resulting from personal injuries sustained, it is not a defense for the employer that the: (1) employee was negligent unless the negligence was willful; (2) injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employee; or (3) employee had assumed the risks inherent in, incident to, or arising out of the employee’s employment or arising from the failure of the employer to provide and maintain a reasonably safe place to work or reasonably safe tools or appliances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.