Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 ND 146 - State v. Shafer-Imhoff

State v. Shafer-Imhoff’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2022

8 state decisions

60200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Steinbach · State v. Burr · State v. Erickstad · State v. Cummings · State v. Carlson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A trial judge is allowed the widest range of discretion in fixing a criminal sentence; this court has no power to review the discretion of the sentencing court in fixing a term of imprisonment within the range authorized by statute. Appellate review of a criminal sentence is generally confined to whether the [district] court acted within the sentencing limits prescribed by statute, or substantially relied upon an impermissible factor. Statutory interpretation, however, is a question of law fully reviewable on appeal.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"We created a narrow exception to the general rule for ameliorating penal legislation. In Cummings, we concluded `unless otherwise indicated by the Legislature, an ameliorating amendment to a criminal statute is reflective of the Legislature's determination that the lesser punishment is the appropriate penalty for the offense.' Because we found a `compelling inference' that the legislature intended to apply retroactively a penal statute that reduced punishment, we created the exception for ameliorating penal legislation."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “prior to the final conviction without infringing on the executive branch's exclusive power to pardon”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.