Schroeder v. Buchholz’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2025
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nastrom v. Nastrom · Kuhlman v. Cargile · Zuger v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n · Apache Corp. v. MDU Resources Group, Inc. · Johnson v. Estate of Zent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. An enrichment; 2. An impoverishment; 3. A connection between the enrichment and the impoverishment; 4. Absence of a justification for the enrichment and impoverishment; and 5. An absence of a remedy at law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'essential element in recovering under a theory of unjust enrichment is the receipt of a benefit by the defendant from the plaintiff which would be inequitable to retain without paying for its value.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is entitled to both the possession and the use of the property ... including the right to rents, issues, and profits generated by the parcel during the tenant's life.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.