Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2001 ND 39

Runge v. Runge

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2001

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2001-02-20

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2006

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-02-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1

¶2[¶ 1] Gregory Ian Runge appealed the district court's judgment determining the valuation and division of marital property. Gregory Runge claims the trial court erred by not explaining the distribution and by dividing the couple's property inequitably. We conclude the trial court's distribution of the couple's marital estate is not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

¶3 [¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶4Dale V. Sandstrom

¶5William A. Neumann

¶6Mary Muehlen Maring

¶7Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J.

¶8 [¶ 3] Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.

/2001/nd/39 · .json · Public domain