Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 ND 95 - Moen v. Thomas

Moen v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Creaghe v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty Co. · Matter of Estate of Raketti · Johnson Farms v. McEnroe · Matter of Estate of Starcher · Towne v. Dinius

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In an appeal from a bench trial, the trial court’s findings of fact are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard of N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a) and its conclusions of law are fully reviewable. Fargo Foods, Inc., v. Bernabucci, 1999 ND 120, ¶ 10 , 596 N.W.2d 38 . A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, if there is no evidence to support it, or if, after reviewing all the evidence, we are left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made. Moen v. Thomas, 2001 ND 95, ¶ 19 , 627 N.W.2d 146 . ‘In a bench trial, the trial court is “the determiner of credibility issues and we do not second-guess the trial court on its credibility determinations.” ’ Id. at ¶ 20.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.