Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2001 Ohio 126

State v. Singh

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2001

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2001-06-27

Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.

Relies on State v. Singh

Decided 2001-06-27

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
92 Ohio St.3d 1213
.]




                THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SINGH, APPELLEE.
                       [Cite as State v. Singh, 
2001-Ohio-126
.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.
        (No. 00-1536—Submitted May 15, 2001—Decided June 27, 2001.)
        APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 98-L-090.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently
allowed.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________
        Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecuting Attorney, Vincent A. Culotta,
Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and Brian L. Summers, Supervisor,
Appellate Division, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
        Morganstern, MacAdams & DeVito Co., L.P.A., and Michael A. Partlow,
for appellee.
        Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State
Solicitor, and Michael R. Gladman, Assistant Solicitor, urging reversal for amicus
curiae, Attorney General of Ohio.
                                  __________________

/2001/ohio/126 · .json · Public domain