State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm.

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




   THE STATE EX REL. HULING, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF
                                    OHIO, APPELLEE.
         [Cite as State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm., 

.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.
     (No. 01-449—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 26, 2001.)
      APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-416.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the
opinion of the court of appeals.
        MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
        DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.
                                  __________________
        ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting.
        {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the
cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v.
Mihm (1994), 

, 

.
        DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting
opinion.
                                  __________________
        Seaman & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Angelique M. Hartzell, for appellant.
        Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
                                  __________________