Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2001 Ohio 1327

In re Walker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2001

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2001-09-19

Motion for reconsideration granted—Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals' judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration of In re Anderson.

Relies on In re Anderson · State ex rel. White v. Mack · 93 Ohio St. 3d 211 - In re Walker

Decided 2001-09-19

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
93 Ohio St.3d 211
.]




                                     IN RE WALKER.
                       [Cite as In re Walker, 
2001-Ohio-1327
.]
Motion for reconsideration granted—Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of
        appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration of In re
        Anderson.
      (No. 01-445—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.)
                          ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The motion for this court to reconsider its judgment denying a
discretionary appeal in In re Walker (2001), 
91 Ohio St.3d 1536
, 
747 N.E.2d 833
,
is granted.
        {¶ 2} The discretionary appeal is allowed.
        {¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is
remanded for consideration of In re Anderson (2001), 
92 Ohio St.3d 63
, 
748 N.E.2d 67
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
        COOK, J., dissents.
                                  __________________
        David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Felice Harris, Assistant
Public Defender, for appellant.
        Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J.
Boychan, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
                                  __________________

/2001/ohio/1327 · .json · Public domain