Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2001 Ohio 155

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2001

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2001-05-30

On application for reinstatement.

Relies on 85 Ohio St. 3d 393 - Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball · 92 Ohio St. 3d 1212 - Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball

Decided 2001-05-30

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
92 Ohio St.3d 1212
.]




                    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BALL.
               [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball, 
2001-Ohio-155
.]
               (No. 98-2214—Submitted and decided May 30, 2001.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent Claire Melvin Ball, Jr., Attorney
Registration No. 0020459,
 last known address in Columbus, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 28, 1999, wherein
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of
two years, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with
the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
        {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED BY THIS COURT that Claire Melvin Ball, Jr., be,
and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent
bear the costs of publication.
        For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball (1999), 
85 Ohio St.3d 393
,
709 N.E.2d 109
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________




                                              1

/2001/ohio/155 · .json · Public domain