State ex rel. Sealey v. Indus. Comm.

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




   THE STATE EX REL. SEALEY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF
                                    OHIO, APPELLEE.
           [Cite as State ex rel. Sealey v. Indus. Comm., 

.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.
   (No. 00-1084—Submitted November 14, 2000—Decided January 17, 2001.)
      APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-588.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the
opinion of the court of appeals.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________
        Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant.
        Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jacob Dobres, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
                                  __________________