Lonas v. Kail

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




                  LONAS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KAIL, APPELLEE.
                       [Cite as Lonas v. Kail, 

.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.
    (No. 00-448—Submitted December 12, 2000—Decided January 31, 2001.)
         APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Harrison County, No. 491.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently
allowed.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.
        COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
                                  __________________
        LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting.
        {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent and would, instead, affirm the judgment of the
court of appeals.
        COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
                                  __________________
        Steven G. Thomakos, for appellants.
        Tate & Renner and Richard R. Renner, for appellee.
        Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant
Attorney General, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Industrial Commission of
Ohio.
                                  __________________