2001 OHIO 264 - Conyne v. Cincinnati

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at

91 Ohio St.3d 207

.]




    CONYNE ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLANT, ET AL.
                   [Cite as Conyne v. Cincinnati,

2001-Ohio-264

.]
Appellate procedure—Final order—Political subdivision tort liability—R.C.
        2744.02(C)—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens
        v. Ackman.
    (No. 00-1928—Submitted February 28, 2001—Decided March 28, 2001.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-000589.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
Stevens v. Ackman (2001),

91 Ohio St.3d 182

743 N.E.2d 901

.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________
        Manley, Burke & Lipton, Timothy M. Burke and Rhonda S. Frey, for
appellees.
        Fay D. Dupuis, City Solicitor, and Richard Ganulin, Assistant City
Solicitor, for appellant.
                                  __________________