Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2001 Ohio 60

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2001

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2001-03-20

On application for termination of probation.

Relies on Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge

Decided 2001-03-20

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
91 Ohio St.3d 1239
.]




                   OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DODGE.
              [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge, 
2001-Ohio-60
.]
              (No. DD 87-6—Submitted and decided March 21, 2001.)
                 ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} On February 20, 2001, respondent filed an application for termination
of probation. The court finds that respondent has substantially complied with
Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order dated November 9, 1988.
        {¶ 2} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of
Carter Rodney Dodge, Attorney 
Registration No. 0003584,
 last known business
address in Cleveland, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated.
        {¶ 3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court, that within
ninety days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that
have been awarded against the respondent by the Clients’ Security Fund pursuant
to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after
the date of this order, the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against the
respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that
amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within ninety days of the notice of such award.
        {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed
with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules
of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form,
number, and timeliness of filings.
        {¶ 5} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent
bear the costs of publication.
                          SUPREME COURT OF OHIO




      For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge (1987), 
32 Ohio St.3d 118
, 
512 N.E.2d 650
.
      MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                           __________________




                                      2

/2001/ohio/60 · .json · Public domain