Beville v. Curry’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2024
5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Brown Shoe Co. v. United States · Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde · National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States · New Jersey v. New York · National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Monopoly power is defined [in the Oklahoma Antitrust Reform Act] as the power to control market prices or exclude competition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“be interpreted in a manner consistent with federal antitrust law ... and the case law applicable thereto.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Market power is the preliminary threshold inquiry and is often dispositive of antitrust cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.