Morgan v. Daxon’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · State Ex Rel. Nuveen v. Greer · King v. Florida · Falcone v. Internal Revenue Service · Russell v. Board of County Commissioners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every act of the Legislature shall embrace but one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title, except general appropriation bills, general revenue bills, and bills adopting a code, digest, or revision of statutes; and no law shall be revived, amended, or the provisions thereof extended or conferred, by reference to its title only; but so much thereof as is revived, amended, extended, or conferred shall be re-enacted and published at length: Provided, That if any subject be embraced in any act contrary to the provisions of this section, such act shall be void only as to so much of the law as may not be expressed in the title thereof. See also Weddington v. Henry, 2008 OK 102, 11 , 202 P.3d 143 ; Fent v. State ex rel. Office of State Finance, 2008 OK 2, 130 , 184 P.3d 467 ; In re Initiative Petition No. 382, State Question No. 729, 2006 OK 45, 118 , 142 P.3d 400 ; Morgan v. Daxon, 2001 OK 104, 11 , 49 P.3d 687 ; Campbell v. White, 1993 OK 89, 120 , 856 P.2d 255 ; Johnson v. Walters, 1991 OK 107, 122 , 819 P.2d 694 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.