Young v. MacY’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Heffron v. District Court of Oklahoma County (2003), Oklahoma Department of Securities ex rel. Faught v. Blair (2010)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital Authority · Manley v. Brown · Cusumano v. Microsoft Corp. · Laubach v. Morgan · Miscellaneous Docket # 1 v. Miscellaneous Docket # 2
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a de movo review, we have plenary, independent, and non-deferential authority to determine whether the trial court erred in its application of the law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Since a summary judgment disposes solely of issues of law we review it de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Service of subpoenas for witnesses in criminal actions in the district courts of this state shall be made in the same manner as in civil actions pursuant to Section 2004.1 of Title 12 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pitts v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.