Kerr v. Clary’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2022
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co. · DLB Energy Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission · Seifried v. State Ex Rel. Bash · Webber v. Webber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(Iln a contempt proceeding, questions of fact will not be reviewed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'The trial court was the trier of the facts. The credibility of the witnesses and the effect and weight to be given to conflicting or inconsistent testimony are questions of fact to be determined by the trier of facts, whether court or jury, and are not questions of law for this Court on appeal.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[the purpose of § 2808(24) is to allow for the admission of hearsay statements not covered by explicit statutory hearsay exceptions but which possess 'equivalent guarantees of trustworthiness. .. .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.