Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2001 OK CR 11

Warner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 2001-04-20

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-04-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2025

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

130200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LILE, Judge:

¶1concurs in results in part and dissents in part.

¶2{1 I Concur in Result as to the Court's reversal and remand of the second stage verdict of death. Failure to grant the requested continuance until Monday when the jury was offered the choice of waiting until Monday to begin deliberations was improper. Appellant's persuasive argument on appeal on this issue convinces me that if a continuance had been granted, the result might have been different. However, I cannot join in the Court's analysis or decision to reverse the first stage verdict of guilt.

/2001/okcr/11 · .json · Public domain