Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 OKCR 25 - Cipriano v. State

Cipriano v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2024

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

120200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kachina Plywood, Inc. v. Hurt · Autek Systems Corp. v. United States · Allen v. Oklahoma · Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda · In re Gaydos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen perpetrated without a design to effect death, and in a heat of passion, but in a cruel and unusual manner, or by means of a dangerous weapon; unless it is committed under such circumstances as constitute excusable or justifiable homicide.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The elements of heat of passion are 1) adequate provocation; 2) a passion or emotion such as fear, terror, anger, rage or resentment; 3) homicide occurred while the passion still existed and before a reasonable opportunity for the passion to cool; and 4) a causal connection between the provocation, passion and homicide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is well established that a defendant is entitled to an instruction on any theory of defense supported by the evidence, as long as that theory is tenable as a matter of law.”) (citation omitted). . See 21 O.S.2001, § 12.1 and 21 O.S.Supp. 2002, § 13.1. These two provisions together comprise the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.