2001 Pa. Super. 137 - Nemirovsky v. Nemirovsky’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably In Re SH (2005), 2005 Pa. Super. 213 - Jones v. Jones (2005)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. City of Philadelphia · Martin v. Evans · 441 Pa. Super. 133 - Estate of Lakatosh · Commonwealth v. Rathfon · Geniviva v. Frisk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) General rule. An appeal may be taken as of right from a collateral order of an administrative agency or lower court. (b) Definition. A collateral order is [1] an order separable from and collateral to the main cause of action [2] where the right involved is too important to be denied review and [3] the question presented is such that if review is post poned until final judgment in the case, the claim will be irreparably lost.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A new trial based on weight of the evidence issues will not be granted unless the verdict is so contrary to the evidence as to shock one’s sense of justice; a mere conflict in testimony will not suffice as grounds for a new trial. It is beyond argument that the fact-finder is free to accept or reject the credibility of both expert and lay witnesses, and to believe all, part or none of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.