2001 Pa. Super. 233 - Commonwealth v. Tuddles’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 280 Pa. Super. 134 - Commonwealth v. Landi · 427 Pa. Super. 629 - In the Interest of D.W. · 2001 Pa. Super. 191 - Commonwealth v. Deaner · 77 Pa. Commw. 15 - Commonwealth v. Lyles · Commonwealth v. Lanehart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever any person has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment in a county jail or workhouse, hereafter referred to as a jail, for a term of less than five years the court, at the time of sentence or at any time thereafter upon application made therefor, may by order direct the sheriff, prison keeper, jail keeper, warden or other administrative head of a jail to permit the prisoner to leave the jail during necessary and reasonable hours for the purpose of working at his employment, conducting his own business or other self-employed occupation, including housekeeping and attending to the needs of family, seeking employment, attendance at an educational institution, securing medical treatment or such other lawful purposes as the court shall consider necessary and appropriate. The order of court may be rescinded or modified at any time with or without notice to the prisoner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] petitioner must make a prima facie claim for modification of sentence or transfer. To make a prima facie claim, a petitioner] must allege that his current facility lacks the resources to treat him or that his illness compromises the collective health of the institution holding him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.