2001 Pa. Super. 256 - Green v. Trust.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy Ghost · Shaffer v. Smith · 452 Pa. Super. 497 - Calabrese v. Calabrese · 455 Pa. Super. 63 - Darby v. Darby · 453 Pa. Super. 576 - Leister v. Leister
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Collateral estoppel applies if (1) the issue decided in the prior case is identical to one presented in the later case; (2) there was a final judgment on the merits; (3) the party against whom the plea is asserted was a party or in privity with a party in the prior case; (4) the party or person privy to the party against whom the doctrine is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior proceeding and (5) the determination in the prior proceeding was essential to the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.