2001 Pa. Super. 288 - In re Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wolfe v. Beal · In Re Commitment of Hutchinson · Commonwealth v. Hubert · In Re Hancock · In Re RD
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The legislative policy reflected in the Mental Health Procedures Act is to require that strict conditions be satisfied before a court order for commitment shall be issued. Such a policy is in accord with the recognition that commitment entails a massive deprivation of liberty.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“on April 16, 2001, an informal hearing was held before a mental health review officer. After the hearing, the mental health review officer certified that [Mr. Ryan] was severely mentally disabled and ordered an additional twenty days of mental health treatment. Three days later , on April 19, 2001, [Mr. Ryan] petitioned the trial court for review of the certification”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we may vacate the certification for involuntary treatment pursuant to section [ ]303, and direct that all records pertaining to this matter be expunged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.