Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 Pa. Super. 298 - Commonwealth v. Jackson

2001 Pa. Super. 298 - Commonwealth v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2023

7 state decisions

30200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Williams · 339 Pa. Super. 373 - Commonwealth v. Sanders · 2000 Pa. Super. 8 - Commonwealth v. Hess · 280 Pa. Super. 338 - Commonwealth v. Nacrelli · Commonwealth v. Strader

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An abuse of discretion is more than just an error in judgment and, on appeal, the trial court will not be found to have abused its discretion unless the record discloses that the judgment exercised was manifestly unreasonable, or the result of partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill-will.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Informal. Before any disclosure or discovery can be sought under these rules by either party, counsel for the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve all questions of discovery, and to provide information required or requested under these rules as to which there is no dispute. When there are items requested by one party which the other party has refused to disclose, the demanding party may make appropriate motion to the court. Such motion shall be made within 14 days after arraignment, unless the time for filing is extended by the court. In such motion the party must set forth the fact that a good faith effort to discuss the requested material has taken place and proved unsuccessful. Nothing in this provision shall delay the disclosure of any items agreed upon by the parties pending resolution of any motion for discovery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.