2001 Pa. Super. 54 - Commonwealth v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Commonwealth v. Burton (2015), 2007 Pa. Super. 158 - Commonwealth v. Turetsky (2007)
63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 379 Pa. Super. 390 - Commonwealth v. Finley · Commonwealth v. Fahy · Commonwealth v. Lark · Frazier v. City of Philadelphia · Commonwealth v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Any petition under this subehap-ter, including a second or subsequent petition, shall be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final, unless the petition alleges and the petitioner proves that: (i) the failure to raise the claim previously was the result of interference by government officials with the presen tation of the claim in violation of the Constitution or laws of this Commonwealth or the Constitution or laws of the United States; (ii) the facts upon which the claim is predicated were unknown to the petitioner and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence; or (iii) the right asserted is a constitutional right that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States or the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania after the time period provided in this section and has been held by that court to apply retroactively.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“the petitioner must plead and prove specific facts that demonstrate [her] claim was raised within the sixty-day time frame”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.