Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 Pa. Super. 77 - Commonwealth v. Coolbaugh

2001 Pa. Super. 77 - Commonwealth v. Coolbaugh’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably 2013 Pa. Super. 70 - Commonwealth v. Griffin (2013), 2013 Pa. Super. 325 - Commonwealth v. Cartrette (2013)

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

160200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Banks Engineering Co., Inc. v. Polons · Commonwealth v. Thornhill · Commonwealth v. Srock · 456 Pa. Super. 498 - Commonwealth v. Cappellini · Commonwealth v. Archer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. the defendant has been convicted of another crime; or 2. the conduct of the defendant indicates that it is likely that he will commit another crime if he is not imprisoned; or 3. such a sentence is essential to vindicate the authority of this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is limited only by the maximum sentence that it could have imposed originally at the time of the probationary sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[S]entencing guidelines do not apply to sentences imposed as a result of probation or parole revocations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.