State v. Bunger’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2020
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · ITT Continental Baking Co. v. William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. · United States v. Thevis · State v. Bernard · Territory of Guam v. Okada
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he law favors admitting relevant evidence no matter how slight its probative value ... ‘It is sufficient that the evidence has a tendency to make a consequential fact even the least bit more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jolley“Any evidence tending to connect an accused with the commission of a crime is relevant and probative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hullinger“[t]he law favors admitting relevant evidence no matter how slight its probative value”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fool Bull
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.