Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 SD 129 - State v. Blakey

State v. Blakey’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ayarza-Garcia · United States v. Nukida · 220 Wis. 2d 371 - State v. Griffin · State v. Cameron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We reserve for a time when it is properly presented the issue of whether this state will follow the majority rule in State v. Griffin, 220 Wis.2d 371 , 584 N.W.2d 127, 131 (Wis.Ct.App.1998) that a urinalysis result alone is not sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for possession of a controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.