Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 SD 51 - State v. Olson-Lame

State v. Olson-Lame’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Henjum · In re the Abuse and Neglect of C.W. · State v. Haase · State v. Neitge · State v. Garnett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all criminal actions, upon conviction of the defendant, the court may adjudge that the defendant pay the whole or any part of the costs of that particular prosecution in addition to the liquidated costs provided by § 23-3-52. However, the costs shall not include items of governmental expense such as juror's fees, bailiff's fees, salaries and expenses of special agents, and reporter's per diem. Payment of costs may be enforced as a civil judgment against the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the legislature sought to make whole under the restitution statute (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “costs of the prosecution under SDCL 23A-27-26 [.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.