State v. Verhoef’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2021
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Martinez-Salazar · State v. Darby · State v. Karlen · State v. Andrews · State v. Moeller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard of review for denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal is whether the “evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions.” “When reviewing sufficiency of the evidence, this [C]ourt, considers the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict.” “A guilty verdict will not be set aside if the state’s evidence and all favorable inferences that can be drawn therefrom support a rational theory of guilt.” “We do not resolve conflicts in the evidence, pass on the credibility of the witnesses, determine the plausibility of an explanation, or weigh the evidence.””
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Phair · State v. Janklow“[a]lthough a potential juror may express a predetermined opinion during voir dire, once [the juror] has declared under oath that [the juror] can act fair and impartial, [the juror] should not be disqualified....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Owens“an unqualified opinion or belief as to the merits of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Owens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.