State v. Perovich’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably State v. Buchhold (2007), State v. Guthmiller (2003)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Missouri v. Hunter · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Whalen v. United States · Garrett v. United States · Gore v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test is not whether we would have made the same ruling, but whether we believe a judicial mind, in view of the law and the circumstances, could have reasonably reached the same conclusion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[E]videntiary rulings made by the trial court are presumed correct and are reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“must also be shown to be prejudicial error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hoadley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.