State v. Redd’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2025
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Redd · State v. Brickey · State v. Morgan · State v. Redd · State v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when potential abusive practices are involved, the presumption is that due process will bar refiling.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“evi-denee for an essential and clear element of a crime at a preliminary hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“forum shopping, repeated filings of groundless and improvident charges for the purpose to harass, ... withholding evidence[,] ... [and] refilling] a charge after providing no evidence of an essential and clear element of a crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.