Tanner v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2026
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scharf v. BMG Corp. · Winegar v. Froerer Corp. · Walker v. U.S. General, Inc. · MacKay v. Hardy · First of Denver Mortgage Investors v. C. N. Zundel & Associates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'On appeal from a bench trial, "[flindings of fact ... shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Roderick v. Ricks · Spears v. Warr“Chen v. Stewart, 2004 UT 82,¶ 20 , 100 P.3d 1177 . Where an appellant fails to so marshal the evidence, we need not consider the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. See Tanner v. Carter, 2001 UT 18,¶ 17 , 20 P.3d 332 . Here, in Cache County I, we specifically noted that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We relate the facts accordingly, granting due deference to the trial court's resolution of factual disputes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roderick v. Ricks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.