Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 UT 26 - State v. One 1980 Cadillac

State v. One 1980 Cadillac’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States Marcus v. Hess · United States v. Ursery · Hudson v. United States · United States v. Ward · United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]irst ... determine whether a statute indicates an express or implied preference for a civil or criminal penalty. Second, where a statute is intended to establish a civil penalty, we must inquire further to determine whether the statutory scheme is so punitive either in purpose or effect as to negate that intention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “constitutional arguments regarding ... due process present questions of law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.