Schuurman v. Shingleton’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2020
1 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 11 Utah 2d 289 - Samms v. Eccles · Simmons v. United States · Zipkin v. Freeman · Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of Wellsville · Peteler v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'offend against the generally accepted standards of decency and morality.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[ ]distinguishable from that commonly suffered by others when an intimate personal relationship fails.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The continuous negligent treatment rule addresses a course of treatment that is allegedly negligent. The entire negligent course of treatment constitutes a single cause of action and, as such, the statute of limitations would not begin to run until the completion of the act giving rise to the cause of action, i.e., the negligent course of treatment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.