Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 UT 68 - State v. Ostler

State v. Ostler’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

1 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably State v. Barrett (2005), State v. Bluff (2002)

1 district · 32 state decisions

250200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp. · Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc. · In Re Worthen · Gutierrez v. Medley · Newspaper Agency Corp. v. Auditing Division of Utah State Tax Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “run[ ] from the date of final disposition of the case at the district court.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) A plea of not guilty may be withdrawn at any time prior to conviction. (2) (a) A plea of guilty or no contest may be withdrawn only upon good cause shown and with leave of the court. (b) A request to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest is made by motion and shall be made within 30 days after the entry of the plea. (3) This section does not restrict the rights of an imprisoned person under Rule 65B, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “within 80 days after the entry of the [final judgment].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.