Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 UT 81 - Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.

Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Madsen v. Borthick · MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc. · Atkin Wright & Miles v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Searle Bros. v. Searle · Frigard v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for correctness, giving no deference to the district court's interpretation.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “power and jurisdiction to supervise and regulate every public utility in this state, and to supervise all of the business of every such public utility in this state, and to do all things ... necessary or convenient in the exercise of- such power and jurisdiction:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] dismissal ..., other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction or for improper venue or for lack of an indispensable party, operates as an adjudication upon the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.