State v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2025
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Larsen · Jones v. State · State v. Whittle · State v. Dail · Stockwell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Brickey does not ... indicate any intent to forbid refiling generally or preclude refiling where a defendant's due process rights are not implicated.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Dlismissal and discharge do not preclude the state from instituting a subsequent prosecution for the same offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]hen potential abusive practices are involved, the presumption is that due process will bar refiling.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.