2001 UT App 13 - State v. Stringham’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2024
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mabry v. Johnson · Mabry v. Johnson · United States v. Nivica · United States v. Ocanas · State v. Hamilton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Failure to give requested jury instructions constitutes reversible error only if their omission tends to mislead the jury to the prejudice of the complaining party or insufficiently or erroneously advises the jury on the law.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Sanchez“Whether the trial court's refusal to give a proposed jury instruction constitutes error is a question of law, which we ... review for correctness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Dalton“of the victim into account as part of the cireumstances it considered in denying Sanchez's request to merge his convictions. 1 16 We therefore conclude that the trial court did not err in refusing to merge San-° chez's kidnapping and assault convictions. 4 II. Proposed Jury Instruction 117 Sanchez next argues that the trial court erred when it refused to give a supplemental jury instruction he proposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sanchez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.