Brixen & Christopher Architects, P.C. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1312 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 6002
Relies on Abel v. United States · United States v. Morton Salt Co. · Oklahoma Press Pub Co v. Walling US News Printing Co · Church of Scientology of California v. United States · Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Utah courts have a 'long history of relying on dictionary definitions to determine plain meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we do not look beyond the language's plain meaning to divine legislative intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.